The Redemption of Althalus
So Robert Jordan came out with the tenth installment of his infinite series. I was half-dreading this moment; all my enthusiasm for the series drained away with the last two terrible books, but I felt half-obliged to read it because, after all, I’ve spent literally half my life reading this story.
Then the (mostly scathing) reviews came in, and I read a summary wherein it became clear to me that absolutely nothing happened in the course of an entire 700 page book, and I said, “Screw it. I’m not reading this, not even in paperback.” And I felt much relieved.
I was, however, left with a jonesing for some good ol’ nostalgic fantasy. Whatever depths Jordan has sunk to now, I still fondly remember sitting in seventh grade study hall intently reading The Eye of the World, and I wanted to read something that would help me recapture that old-school feeling. So, I turned to David and Leigh Eddings’ The Redemption of Althalus.
It’s no secret that Eddings is not particularly well-respected by the fantasy literati. His characters are undeniably stereotypes, his world-building is wildly implausible, and his plots tend toward the repetitive. For all that, though, I’ve always liked Eddings, in a trashy pleasure sort of way. His characters are bouncily fun, his plots are complex without being byzantine (admittedly, it works best not to think too deeply about matters; but I’m good at not doing that), and his writing has that element I’ve praised time and again on this booklog: pull-you-in pacing.
And in particular, I’d adored Eddings in seventh grade. I read The Belgariad repeatedly — but then, so has anyone who read The Mallorean. (Ba-dum ching! Thank you, I’ll be here all week.) Eddings is basically Dave Duncan without any sense of originality, which doesn’t work quite as well for me now, but was perfectly fine for me then.
My main hesitation with reading an Eddings novel now was that, about the time he started sharing credit with his wife, his books started sucking. Belgarath the Sorcerer was one of the worst novels I’ve read — it wasn’t just trashy, it was dull. I wasn’t sure if this represented a permanent decline in Eddings’ capability, or was just because that novel was a prequel, and prequels always suck (sole exception: Vernor Vinge’s superb A Deepness in the Sky).
At the evidence of Althalus, I’m willing to say that it was the prequel thing. This was a bouncy read that had all the virtues of classic Eddings. And, unlike Jordan’s latest extrusion, it managed to cram an entire plot into a mere 700 pages. So yeah, not great literature, but as generic fantasy goes, it’s very readable stuff. And if the ending is incredibly lame — which it is — well, at least it has an ending.
Comments
Dude, I loved Eddings too, although I was about a sophomore in high school when I started the Belgariad. I can still recall buying the second or third book of the Mallorean when I was a freshman in college and it came out in hardback. Then I flamed out on the third series (the Elenium?), when I realized it was pretty much just the same as the first two, and besides, I wasn’t in high school anymore. So, I have a lingering fondness for that stuff, but I don’t dare go back and read it again, ‘cause I’m pretty sure it wouldn’t hold up.
P.S. Like the new look. Were you in a re-designin’ mood?
Probably wouldn’t hold up, no — there was quite a lot in this book that would have really irritated me if I hadn’t been predisposed toward charitability and low expectations.
As for the look, I was playing around with the alternate stylesheets feature (If you use Mozilla, look at the View->Use Style menu item — it lets you select from multiple author-specified stylesheets, or (for that Netscape 1.0 look), no stylesheet at all. And if you don’t use Mozilla, you should. It is to IE 6 what IE 5 was to Navigator 4 — a clearly superior browser in every way.), and I realized that I liked my alternate style better than the default one. It’s probably just the novelty, but there you are.
Dude, I hate to tell you, but Eddings sucked before he started sharing credit with his wife. (This is probably an age-related thing; I didn’t read his stuff in 7th grade or high school, but during college.)
I like the new style, too, FWIW.
The burning question, left unanswered by your review, is: “Does the plot of this book involve wisecracking characters chasing a magic blue rock?”
It’s not old-school Eddings without Magic Blue Rocks.
The new look sucks, btw. All aesthetic decisions made by people other than me and Kate suck! People who paint brick should be roasted in tandoor ovens! People who put pink tile in bathrooms should be publisly flogged!
What? Oh, sorry. I’m better now. Really.
Off to paint…
(The new look is fine.)
Wisecracking characters: Yes. (You know they’re being funny because the people they’re talking to break out laughing. It’s not otherwise clear from context.)
Blue rock: No! I was shocked by the omission, I must say.
Incidentally, on reflection, I think this book sucked a little more than I admitted in that review.
Aesthetic decisions: You would have loved the leopard-print themed bathroom in one of the houses Anne and I looked at last week. Very much a “What were you THINKING?” moment.
Pink tile in bathroom doesn’t sound too weird. Even the leopard-print bathroom isn’t out of the realm of conceivability[1], but painting brick? What’s up with that.
Having lived in many, many houses over the course of my life, I think that you get especially weird decorating choices in bathrooms, as a rule. Maybe it’s because it’s a small room, and so it’s an easy testing ground for crazy home-decor ideas that pass through homeowners minds. Just off the top of my head, my family has lived in houses with 1. a nautical-themed bathroom, and 2. a bathroom with shiny foil butterfly wallpaper. (Not both in the same house, thankfully.)
Leopard… print… bathroom. That just doesn’t compute.
But more and more, I love my apartment.
True story: While hanging around a lighting store trying to pick out bathroom lights, I overheard two appalling snippets of conversation between a woman who was discussing lighting choices with one of the store employees:
“That would’ve been perfect, because we’re doing the whole room in leopard, but it was just too expensive.”
“Oh, that’ll be perfect, because we’re planning to put a couple of deer heads on the wall.”
I hope to God she was talking about lamps for two different rooms…
(The lights still haven’t come in, but the rest of the bathroom remodel is done, and it looks very nice. “Before” and “After” pictures will probably be posted at some point…)
I think deer heads can class up any bathroom.
Our master bathroom is mint green, with peach accents. The 60’s were not a good decade for color coordination. The house is horribly laid out, so a mint green bathroom doesn’t seem like such a big deal compared to the 44-foot hallway and the Worst Kitchen of All Time.